J. Sheng
There is a growing interests in
understanding micro-scale bio-physical processes, such as the kinematics and
dynamics of swimming micro-organisms, e.g. bacteria, dinoflagellates or
nauplii, and their interactions with the surrounding fluids. Direct observations on such processes
require suitable tools that are capable of resolving both temporal and spatial
scales at the appropriate levels. The
readily available candidate is the optical microscope. However, as shown in Figure, as the
power
of the microscope increases and the lateral resolution (1.22l/NA, where l
is the wavelength and NA is numerical aperture of the entire optical system)
improves, the field of view and depth of field decrease non-linearly to a very
thin layer. For example, increasing the power from 10x to 40x reduces the
theoretical depth of field from 12mm to
2mm, greatly limiting the size of
resolvable volume. Holography, on the other hand, is capable of recording a 3D
volumetric field on a single plane (hologram plane) and later reconstructing
it. With the recent development of
in-line digital holography for particulate flows, it is now possible to record
the hologram on a digital medium, and then reconstruct the sample volume
numerically. we combines in-line digital holography and a conventional
microscope objective in order to circumvent the obstacles associated with the
limited resolution of a digital recording medium. Using the same setup as an
optical microscope, we replace the light source with a collimated, coherent
laser beam, and record a stream of magnified holograms on a CCD camera. The 3D fields can be reconstructed from
these magnified holograms at almost the same resolution as the optical
microscopes. Reconstructed holograms of sample volumes with depth of 1 to 10
mm, containing particles ranging in size between 0.75 to 3 mm, demonstrate the efficacy of the Digital
Holographic Microscope (DHM) as viable means of extending the depth of field of
a microscope by almost three orders of magnitude.
The
optical setup is very similar to a conventional transmission light microscope,
but instead of using white light, we replace it with a coherent laser beam. In
the current setup, we spatially filter a 3mw, He-Ne laser beam using a 25mm pinhole, expand and collimate the beam to
30mm diameter, and then illuminate the sample volume. Since the resulting
intensity, 0.33mW/cm2, is still too high, we use a variable Neutral
Density (ND) filter to further attenuate the beam. In most of the tests, a filter of ND=1 is used, reducing the
illumination intensity on the specimen to ~30mW/cm2. A bright field microscope objective with
proper tube length is used to imaging the optical
field (hologram) onto the digital recording medium (CCD sensor). Note that the object plane is located
outside of the sample volume.
A hologram is a record of
interference between light scattered from objects, e.g. micron or sub-micron
particles, and a reference beam with known phase distribution 19. One can represent the optical field at the
hologram plane
as
, (1)
where
is the propagation
vector of the reference beam and
is the norm vector of
the hologram plane. The first term
represents the optical field of the reference beam, where the phase accounts
for its angle with the scattering light, assuming that the hologram is
perpendicular to the scattering axis. In the following analysis we assume that
this angle is zero. The second term is the superposition of light scattered
from discrete particles located at a distance zi from the hologram plane, and produce (by being
illuminated) fields with local distributions of
. Thus, each particle is considered as a superposition of
point sources, whose individual fields are
. Using a paraxial approximation for particles much smaller
than
,
(2)
If the scattering is
diffraction dominated, as in in-line holography, each particle can be
considered as a 2D aperture with a shape equal to its cross-section normal to
the incident light. Thus, scattering
from an individual particle is a convolution of a 2D aperture with the impulse
response function (Eq. 2). The resulting interference intensity on the hologram
plane,
, is
(3)
where
indicates a
convolution integral. To determine the
effect of the microscope objective, we model its compound lens system as a
perfect thin lens. The optical field at the distance
behind the lens,
resulting from an optical disturbance,
, where
the object distance
before the lens, is
,
where
,
and
is the magnification.
Replacing
with
and performing the
integration, the optical field generated by the hologram at the image plane is
(4)
Thus, the image plane contains a magnified hologram plane with a phase correction that becomes unity when the magnification is sufficiently large. The intensity distribution in the image plane simply becomes a magnified hologram
. (5)
which contains the four contributors presented in Eq. 3. This true magnified hologram enables us to drastically relax the spatial resolution requirement of recording medium. Furthermore, we can use the magnification as a means of matching the desired resolution with that of the recording medium. As shown in this paper, the magnified holograms.

(a) Part of a hologram recorder using a 10X objective, containing 3.189 mm diameter particles in a 1mm deep solution. (b - d) Reconstruction of planes located 120mm, 580mm and 800 mm from the hologram plane. In focus particles appear as dark spots on the bright background. (e) A combined/compressed image containing all the particles covered by the hologram section shown in a. (f) The location of all the particles detected within the entire 1.5x1.5x1 mm3 volume, totaling 5769 particles.


A demonstration of a cinematographic DHM. (a) Combined/compressed tracks, consisting of 5 exposures, of 3.189mm particle located within a 1mm deep sample; (b) Sample tracks, consisting of 7 consecutive exposures, of 0.75mm particles, combined over a depth of 100mm.
